Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 91-96 , December 2008

Changes in Electrical Skin Resistance at Gallbladder 34 (GB34)

  • Sybille Kramer

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Daniela Zaps

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Bernhard Wiegele

      Affiliations

    • Fachbereich Elektrotechnik, FH Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Dominik Irnich

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Dominik Irnich Interdisziplinäre Schmerzambulanz Innenstadt der LMU Pettenkoferstr. 8a 80336 Muenchen Germany

Received 1 April 2008 ,Accepted 9 September 2008.

  • Image Result

    Factors that influence ESRM results. These factors should be taken into account and need to be eliminated if ESRMs are to produce valid results.

    Factors that influence ESRM results. These factors should be taken into account and need to be eliminated if ESRMs are to produce valid results.

  • Image Result

    Electrical skin resistance measurements (ESRMs): (A) ESRM array consisting of 64 electrodes on a 6 × 6 cm square plastic foil. (B) Screenshot of ESRM analyzing software, ESR values are indicated in co

    Electrical skin resistance measurements (ESRMs): (A) ESRM array consisting of 64 electrodes on a 6 × 6 cm square plastic foil. (B) Screenshot of ESRM analyzing software, ESR values are indicated in colors and arbitrary units.

  • Image Result
    Graphical presentation of ESR at GB34: an example of a measurement with significantly lower electrical skin resistance (p = 0.0048). The areas of the AP G834 and the nearby ST36 are indicated by circl

    Graphical presentation of ESR at GB34: an example of a measurement with significantly lower electrical skin resistance (p = 0.0048). The areas of the AP G834 and the nearby ST36 are indicated by circles. ESR is indicated in color: low ESR values are blue and high ESR values are red.

  • Image Result
    Graphical presentation of ESR at GB34: an example of a measurement with significantly lower electrical skin resistance (p = 0.0048). The areas of the AP GB34 and the nearby ST36 are indicated by circl

    Graphical presentation of ESR at GB34: an example of a measurement with significantly lower electrical skin resistance (p = 0.0048). The areas of the AP GB34 and the nearby ST36 are indicated by circles. Differences in ESR are shown by level curves.

  • Image Result
    Results of electrical skin resistance measurements (ESRMs): 81 ESRMs were evaluated. 15 showed a significantly lower and 12 a significantly higher ESR than the surrounding areas.

    Results of electrical skin resistance measurements (ESRMs): 81 ESRMs were evaluated. 15 showed a significantly lower and 12 a significantly higher ESR than the surrounding areas.

 GrantThis study was supported by the German Medical Acupuncture Association (DÄGfA).

PII: S2005-2901(09)60028-5

doi: 10.1016/S2005-2901(09)60028-5

Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 91-96 , December 2008